AI adoption in tax administration

These answers come from the OECD's Inventory of Tax Technology Initiatives (ITTI), in which each administration describes its own technology use. This page reproduces those answers and labels them as self-reported โ€” it does not independently verify what any authority actually does with AI. A "No" means the administration reported no such use at the time it answered the survey, not that such use is impossible or ruled out.

53
report using AI
55
report not using AI
39
use AI for fraud/evasion detection
4
use AI in final administrative decisions

Administrations reporting they use artificial intelligence

CountryReported answer
๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡ฑ AlbaniaYes
๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡ฒ ArmeniaYes
๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡บ AustraliaYes
๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡น AustriaYes
๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡ฟ AzerbaijanYes
๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ท BrazilYes
๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ฌ BulgariaYes
๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฆ CanadaYes
๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ ChinaYes
๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ด ColombiaYes
๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ท Costa RicaYes
๐Ÿ‡ญ๐Ÿ‡ท CroatiaYes
๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡บ CubaYes
๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ฐ DenmarkYes
๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡จ EcuadorYes
๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡ช EstoniaYes
๐Ÿ‡ซ๐Ÿ‡ฎ FinlandYes
๐Ÿ‡ซ๐Ÿ‡ท FranceYes
๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ช GermanyYes
๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ท GreeceYes
๐Ÿ‡ญ๐Ÿ‡ฐ Hong Kong SAR, ChinaYes
๐Ÿ‡ญ๐Ÿ‡บ HungaryYes
๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ฉ IndonesiaYes
๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ช IrelandYes
๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ฑ IsraelYes
๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡น ItalyYes
๐Ÿ‡ฏ๐Ÿ‡ต JapanYes
๐Ÿ‡ฐ๐Ÿ‡ท Korea, Rep.Yes
๐Ÿ‡ฑ๐Ÿ‡ป LatviaYes
๐Ÿ‡ฑ๐Ÿ‡ธ LesothoYes
๐Ÿ‡ฑ๐Ÿ‡น LithuaniaYes
๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡พ MalaysiaYes
๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ฑ MaliYes
๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ณ MongoliaYes
๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ฟ New ZealandYes
๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ด NorwayYes
๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡ญ PhilippinesYes
๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡ฑ PolandYes
๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡น PortugalYes
๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ฆ Saudi ArabiaYes
๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ฌ SingaporeYes
๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ฎ SloveniaYes
๐Ÿ‡ฟ๐Ÿ‡ฆ South AfricaYes
๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡ธ SpainYes
๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ช SwedenYes
๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ผ TaiwanYes
๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ฏ TajikistanYes
๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ญ ThailandYes
๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ท TurkiyeYes
๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡ช United Arab EmiratesYes
๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง United KingdomYes
๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ United StatesYes
๐Ÿ‡ฟ๐Ÿ‡ฒ ZambiaYes

AI used for detection of tax evasion and fraud

CountryReported answer
๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡ฑ AlbaniaYes
๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡ฒ ArmeniaYes
๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡บ AustraliaYes
๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡น AustriaYes
๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡ฟ AzerbaijanYes
๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ท BrazilYes
๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฆ CanadaYes
๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ด ColombiaYes
๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ท Costa RicaYes
๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡บ CubaYes
๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ฐ DenmarkYes
๐Ÿ‡ซ๐Ÿ‡ฎ FinlandYes
๐Ÿ‡ซ๐Ÿ‡ท FranceYes
๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ช GermanyYes
๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ท GreeceYes
๐Ÿ‡ญ๐Ÿ‡บ HungaryYes
๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ฉ IndonesiaYes
๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ฑ IsraelYes
๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡น ItalyYes
๐Ÿ‡ฏ๐Ÿ‡ต JapanYes
๐Ÿ‡ฑ๐Ÿ‡น LithuaniaYes
๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡พ MalaysiaYes
๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ฑ MaliYes
๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ณ MongoliaYes
๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ฟ New ZealandYes
๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ด NorwayYes
๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡ญ PhilippinesYes
๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡ฑ PolandYes
๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ฆ Saudi ArabiaYes
๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ฌ SingaporeYes
๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ฎ SloveniaYes
๐Ÿ‡ฟ๐Ÿ‡ฆ South AfricaYes
๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡ธ SpainYes
๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ช SwedenYes
๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ผ TaiwanYes
๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ญ ThailandYes
๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง United KingdomYes
๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ United StatesYes
๐Ÿ‡ฟ๐Ÿ‡ฒ ZambiaYes

AI involved in making final administrative decisions

This is a different and more consequential thing than AI assisting a human reviewer: it means the administration itself reported that AI plays a role in producing the decision that is final, not a recommendation a person then signs off on. The list below reports exactly what each administration told the OECD โ€” it is not an assessment of due-process safeguards, appeal rights, or how much human review actually sits around that AI step.

CountryReported answer
๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡ฑ AlbaniaYes
๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡ฒ ArmeniaYes
๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡ฟ AzerbaijanYes
๐Ÿ‡ฟ๐Ÿ‡ฒ ZambiaYes